Photographers most often shoot infrared during sunny days to catch the maximum infrared light from the sun. However, the sun is not the only source of infrared light, and it is also possible to practice infrared photography at night within several parameters.
We will see in this tutorial how it is possible to shoot infrared pictures at night and the effects of this technique in term of composition and colors.
Shooting at night means shooting without sun. This powerful source of infrared light is replaced by urban lighting. This light source can emit a certain amount of infrared light along with visible light, and the exact amount is based on the lighting technology and the amount of infrared light each type of bulb emits.
Urban lighting is also characterized by its spaced distribution and its closeness to the ground. Most of the time, lights of the city are places at 4 or 5 meters upper the street, which is far lower than sun. This distribution will impact the way you will frame and compose your image, to avoid flare occurrence.
Flare is one of the most common issues encountered in digital infrared photography. During the day, it appears when the framing is too close to the location of the sun when using wide angle lenses. At night, avoiding flare will be more difficult, due to the far more number of light sources.
The following images, shot at 720nm, show the flare occurrence from the full moon at two different focal lengths:
Focal length: 27mm on full frame camera
Focal length: 16mm on full frame camera
This example shows that zooming at night will help get the different light sources out of the frame, and so will reduce the amount of flare in the picture.
Another solution to reduce the amount of flare is the use of a sunshade or lens hood.
In this section, the same composition was shot with each of the following infrared filters:
Each picture was taken with the same exposure settings. ISO and exposure time were adjusted to achieve this exposure. Channel swap was applied in post-processing.
The 850nm infrared filter is not very useful at night. It is very sensitive to flare and needs a lot of infrared light to expose correctly. Moreover, there is no speical infrared effect visible here.
720nm infrared filter is more interesting. Flare is still highly visible, but the exposure is much better, with great details under the bridge. The infrared effect is visible here, with white foliage and a moody blue color.
590nm infrared filter follows the previous observations. The sky is a bit darker due to the impact of visible light to the exposure measurement. Exposure time is also shorter.
550nm infrared filter offers a close result compared with 590nm. The exposure time is even shorter.
Conclusion: Not all infrared filters produce good results when shooting night scenes. The 850nm filter is too selective to create an interesting effect in most cases and requests too much infrared light compared with the emission of urban lights. Other infrared filters, from 550nm to 720nm, are usable and offer their own color mood.
Â
As shown in the previous part, each infrared filter has its own color cast, not only on the foliage but also on the light sources.
The color of the foliage is still white but less bright. The urban light is blue or white.
The color of the foliage is yellow, the same way as in dadaylight. The urban light is blue or yellow and clearer than at 720nm.
The color of the foliage is red, the same way as in daylight. The urban light is cyan, green or red and even clearer than at 590nm.
Conclusion: at night, the color of the foliage stays the same as it is during the day for each infrared filter. The main impact is visible on the color of the urban light: the less selective the filter is, the colors vary.
Regarding the previous parts of this tutorial, here is a summary of the elements to take into account to obtain quality infrared pictures at night:
Here is an example of what you can obtain with these recommendations at 550nm:
In this picture, a flare was reduced using the dodge and burn technique to darken it.
One last parameter should be taken into account: the weather. During an overcast night, the clouds will act as reflectors and infrared light will have a better distribution.
Since there are no urban light sources out in nature, infrared landscape photography is very difficult to do at night.
The only type of picture you can usually take would be pictures of stars and the Milky Way with ISO set very high. In this case, the results will be no better than shots taken without infrared filters at all due to the low levels of visible light. For this kind of photo, a full-spectrum camera is a better choice.
Canon 6D full-spectrum – 14mm – F/2.8 – 3200iso – 20s
Yes. The article explains that although infrared photography is most often done during sunny days, the sun is not the only source of infrared light, so night infrared photography is possible within certain limits.
At night, sunlight is replaced mainly by urban lighting, which can emit both visible and infrared light depending on bulb type and lighting technology. The article notes that city lights are lower and more numerous than the sun, which changes composition and increases flare risk.
Kolari’s comparison says 850nm is usually too selective for night scenes because it needs too much infrared light and is very flare-sensitive. Filters from 550nm to 720nm are more usable at night and each creates a different color mood.
The tutorial recommends staying farther from light sources, choosing higher or more isolated viewpoints, adjusting exposure to avoid overexposure, increasing ISO when needed, and using a sunshade or lens hood. Zooming can also help keep light sources out of the frame and reduce flare.
The article says infrared landscape photography at night is very difficult because there are no urban infrared light sources in nature. For stars or Milky Way shots, Kolari suggests that a full-spectrum camera is usually a better choice than using infrared filters alone.